Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 20:26

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
The Fog of Trade War Is Causing Confusion About Price Increases - WSJ
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Let’s just make it real clear:
Why did my bipolar girlfriend split up with me?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Oregon lands a commitment from one of the nation's top WRs Messiah Hampton - On3.com
What’s next?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Can you explain the difference between “mi piace” and “mi piacciono” in Italian?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Intel Is A Buy (Technical Analysis) (NASDAQ:INTC) - Seeking Alpha
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Thank you.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Oldest depiction of the Milky Way galaxy discovered in an Egyptian sarcophagus - Earth.com
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Scientists Discover Promising New Alzheimer’s Treatment - SciTechDaily